This book is a joke. Or would be if not accepted as "true" by so many conservatives.
This pseudo-historian wingnut has a track record of "re-writing" history in the best tradition of revisionism history in its most strongest style... and, as a rightwing wingnut, ALWAYS very strongly towards a very Ultra Right bias and agenda.
The fact of an "endorsement" by ultra conservative wingnut Glenn Beck itself speaks volumes. As to the Wikipedia articles, the "highly prejudiced article's", I checked all the ones that were directly or indirectly related to this book, the author, and even Beck... And found them to be quite well referenced and TRUTHFUL as I could determine based upon exhaustive research - often based on their on comments at some prior time).
Maybe this should have been listed as a novel and under the Subject heading of "Alternate Histories" and "Alternate Universes".
NOTICE: Attempts to censor my comments will be fiercely fought under the aegis of American Library Association's beloved principles: Freedom of Speech, Freedom to Read, Intellectual Freedom.